Run a company maven repo. I’d like to see a lot more in the test directory, though. I might be way off, but there appears to be some low hanging fruit here. Can you share with us the call stacks and details about the test environment, like versions of SQL Server, Windows, client application details and client OS? Another point is that jTDS is available via maven, the Microsoft driver is not.
|Date Added:||1 March 2012|
|File Size:||60.86 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
And it still performs very well.
They’ve also got some star imports in there there’s an issue for it. First off kudos to microsoft for open sourcing their JDBC driver.
The code isn’t even consistently formatted. It looks like the Prepared Statements are not being cached and reused. Examining the call stacks there are a number of things that look suspicious: Yes No It wasn’t accurate.
But that’s not so easy for a driver. Having said mcirosoft of this, I don’t know of the licenses within SQL Server itself which may or may not restrict third-party drivers such as jTDS connecting to it.
Replace the jTDS driver with Microsoft JDBC driver
However it does not support datetime2 improved precision fully – it gets treated as datetime. Help us improve MSDN. There are parts that make you say ouch. The only thing worse than running into a deep-in-the-stack bug in a database driver is one that you can’t correct, let alone debug properly.
While for many years jTDS was much superior ve buggy mssql’s own driver, the things are changing to the opposite recently. MSSQL, on the microosoft hand Jul 12 ’17 at JDBC4 was introduced with Java 6.
Related content No related content found. However, unlike their other repos there are a couple of things that strike out.
Transitioning from jTDS to Microsoft’s JDBC driver – Atlassian Documentation
The following briefly describes my specific usage and performance observations. As if the microsofy that jTDS is mostly unmaintained wasn’t enough reason not to use it, the MS driver supports several extra useful features e. This is important if you want to use Hibernate 4. Akonkagva on Nov 18, Doing good job there. Having dealt with many database drivers over the years, I can say first hand that closed source drivers are the bane of microoft existence. The exact values to use in the new URL are beyond the scope of this documentation; they must be chosen based on the jTDS settings they are replacing.
The content you requested has been removed.
java – differences between ms sql microsoft’s jdbc drivers and jTDS’s driver – Stack Overflow
Another point is that jTDS is available via maven, the Microsoft driver is not. Friday, January 23, 5: Can you share with us the call stacks and details about the test environment, like versions of SQL Server, Windows, client application details and client OS? The secret sauce is always on the server side so it doesn’t buy you anything. The value of Google jtvs is not in the software itself, but also in the data. I’m sure that they’d appreciate help in cleaning it miccrosoft.
Isnt everyone using jTDS anyway because it is reliably faster?